Qualified Small Business Stock: Redemption Issues

By Joe Wallin | Updated September 10, 2026

A corporate buyback can disqualify QSBS held by someone who never sold a share. Apply §1202(c)(3) and Treas. Reg. §1.1202-2 separately to each issuance and holder: the related-person and significant-redemption rules have different windows, thresholds and exceptions.

A buyback review should identify the affected stock issuances before anyone assumes the transaction is harmless. The analysis depends on who sells, when the company purchases the stock, the amounts and values involved, and the applicable exceptions.

What Is QSBS? A Quick Refresher on the Updated Rules

Section 1202 permits a noncorporate taxpayer to exclude eligible gain on qualifying stock, subject to holding periods and per-issuer limits. The 2025 amendments changed several eligibility and exclusion rules, but did not eliminate the redemption tests.

Separate issuance timing from the shareholder’s statutory acquisition date. The $75 million gross-assets ceiling applies to stock issued after July 4, 2025, with indexing after 2026. Qualifying stock acquired after that date can receive 50%, 75% or 100% exclusions after at least three, four or five years. Its dollar-limit component starts at $15 million, indexed after 2026, reduced by eligible gain previously taken into account under Section 1202(a), with coordination for earlier-acquired stock; the ten-times-basis alternative remains. The reduction uses eligible gain taken into account, not merely the dollars excluded. For example, $4 million of eligible gain used for a 50% exclusion generally consumes $4 million of the dollar-limit component, although the exclusion is $2 million. See Section 1202(b)(4).

Stock acquired on or before July 4, 2025 generally requires more than five years; qualifying acquisitions after September 27, 2010 receive the 100% percentage, while older acquisitions can remain in the historical 50% or 75% regimes. The $10 million dollar-limit component is not an absolute ceiling because ten-times-basis can be larger. Apply statutory acquisition and tacking rules; a later issuance or transfer date alone does not determine the regime. The redemption rules apply to both regimes.

The Redemption Problem: When the Company Buys Back Your Stock

The related-person rule tests the four-year period beginning two years before the issuance. More-than-de-minimis purchases from the taxpayer or persons related under §267(b) or §707(b) can disqualify that taxpayer’s tested shares, unless an exception applies. Purchases from unrelated holders require separate analysis under the significant-redemption rule.

Apply the two tests in Section 1202(c)(3) and Treasury Regulation §1.1202-2. A business reason for a buyback is not, by itself, an exception to either test.

Test each issuance independently. A purchase can fall within several issuances’ windows, but the holders, aggregate purchases, valuation denominators and exceptions must be evaluated for each test. A failure for one issuance does not automatically establish failure for every share issued during its window, or for the entire company.

The Significant Redemption Test: The Real Gatekeeper

For each issuance, the significant-redemption rule tests the two-year period beginning one year before issuance. It requires purchases exceeding the regulation’s de minimis amount and aggregate purchased-stock value exceeding 5% of all corporate stock value at the beginning of that particular period, after applying disregarded-purchase exceptions.

There are distinct conditions: more than $10,000 aggregate paid and more than 2% purchased under the regulation’s percentage method, plus the separate more-than-5%-of-starting-value test. Exceeding 5% alone is not sufficient. Staying at or below 5% does not protect against the separate related-person rule.

Example: all corporate stock was worth $10 million at the start of a particular issuance’s two-year window. The 5% comparison amount is $500,000. Purchases above $500,000 satisfy that value condition, but disqualification still requires exceeding both de minimis prongs and no applicable exception. This is not a general $500,000 safe redemption budget. Another issuance has its own window and potentially a different starting denominator.

For an issuance close to formation, the statutory starting date may precede the corporation’s existence. That creates an interpretive issue requiring specific advice; do not replace an unavailable historical value with an assumed zero and present the resulting disqualification as settled law. Document formation, issuance and purchase dates and the reasoning used.

The key insight here is the timing window. For the significant-redemption rule, that window runs from one year before your issuance to one year after; the related-party rule reaches wider, two years on each side. A redemption outside the relevant window generally won't disqualify your QSBS. The related-party rule applies to you and related parties collectively, so you need to aggregate redemptions across family members and controlled entities.

The De Minimis Safe Harbor and Other Exceptions

Apply de minimis in the aggregate over the relevant window, not independently to each small buyback. Both prongs must be exceeded: aggregate paid above $10,000 and summed purchase percentages above 2%. For each purchase, divide the purchased stock’s then-value by the immediately-before-purchase value of stock held by the taxpayer and related persons for rule (a), or all outstanding stock for rule (b); add the percentages across purchases. Two purchases of 1.2% each total 2.4%, not two separately disregarded sub-2% purchases. If aggregate paid exceeds $10,000, the de minimis protection fails, although the significant-redemption rule still has its separate 5% condition.

Reg. §1.1202-2(d) disregards specified purchases. The termination exception requires stock acquired in connection with employee or director services and purchased incident to retirement or another bona fide termination; it does not cover all stock a departing employee happened to own. The independent-contractor provision is reserved. The death exception requires the specified pre-death stock or option ownership, an eligible seller and purchase within three years and nine months after death. Disability or mental incompetency and divorce have their own incident-to conditions. Under paragraph (c), qualifying shareholder transfers to employees or independent contractors in connection with services are not corporate purchases, even where §1.83-6(d)(1) otherwise treats the transfer as passing through the corporation.

Real-World Scenarios Where This Matters Most

Buybacks and secondary sales. Identify who buys the shares. A direct investor purchase is not automatically a corporate redemption; corporate purchases, indirect purchases and §304(a) deemed redemptions require analysis. For departing employees, test whether the service-termination exception actually covers the stock and transaction.

Preferred-stock transactions. A corporate repurchase can trigger a redemption test; a stock conversion is not automatically a repurchase. Apply the four-year related-person window and two-year significant-redemption window separately. There is no combined “two-year lookback or one-year forward” test.

Earnouts and contingent consideration. Determine whether the arrangement is a corporate purchase or deemed redemption, when purchases occur, and which amounts and stock values belong in each test. A contingent payment near a stock issuance is not automatically disqualifying.

Equity compensation adjustments. Determine whether shares were actually issued and purchased, rather than assuming every net-settled award or withheld unit is a corporate stock purchase. Apply the de minimis and other exceptions to actual or deemed purchases; transaction mechanics matter.

How to Protect Your QSBS Status: Practical Planning Tips

Before announcing a buyback, identify each affected issuance, holder relationship, testing window, purchase value and potential exception. Aggregate purchases for each de minimis test; do not disregard each small transaction separately. Then apply the independent 5% condition for significant redemptions and the separate related-person rule.

Map the two-year significant-redemption window and four-year related-person window from each issuance date. Moving an issuance beyond one year from a purchase does not alone resolve a related-person issue, and other purchases may remain in the relevant window. Evaluate actual calendar dates and the full purchase history.

Document everything. The company should maintain clear records of all stock acquisitions, redemptions, and repurchases, along with the dates and amounts. When you need to substantiate QSBS status to the IRS, this contemporaneous documentation is invaluable.

Consider whether a permitted third-party secondary, a compensation payment or another structure meets the business objective, but analyze the transaction actually implemented. A cash payment that acquires stock can still be a redemption; a recapitalization is not an automatic workaround.

Options are not themselves QSBS; stock acquired on exercise may qualify if the statutory requirements are met. For restricted stock and early exercise, distinguish actual transfer and issuance from the shareholder holding period under §83 and any timely §83(b) election. An option grant alone does not begin a stock holding period. Do not categorically equate vesting with every §1202 issuance date: identify the award, transfer, election and applicable rule before mapping redemption windows.

What If You've Already Been Hit?

For a completed buyback, reconstruct each issuance’s window, aggregate purchases and percentage denominators, then test exceptions. A purchase outside one window may lie inside another. Apply the related-person and significant-redemption rules independently before concluding that QSBS was lost.

The defenses that actually appear in the regulation are the de minimis disregard and the §1.1202-2(d) exceptions for termination of services, death, disability, and divorce. Whether a particular redemption fits one is fact-specific — worth a detailed analysis with a tax advisor who knows Section 1202 before you concede the exclusion is gone.

Planning Forward with the New OBBBA Rules

The post-July 4, 2025 rules allow partial exclusions at shorter holding periods, but do not create an exemption from the redemption rules. Test a proposed buyback against each affected issuance even if the holder already satisfies a holding-period threshold.

Coordinate the proposed transaction documents, stock ledger, valuation records, and tax analysis. The person arranging the buyback needs the dates and relationships required to test the potentially affected stock.

Complete the review before committing to a repurchase. Record which tests apply, how the thresholds were calculated, and why any exception is available. The cost and scope depend on the records and transaction.

Can a company buyback disqualify my QSBS?

Yes, if it meets the applicable related-person or significant-redemption test after aggregation, de minimis rules and exceptions. A buyback does not automatically disqualify every shareholder or every issuance.

Which shares does a disqualifying redemption affect?

Analyze each holder and issuance separately. Each issuance has its own testing window; the significant-redemption starting valuation can also differ. A failure for one issuance does not automatically establish a company-wide loss of QSBS.

What are the two redemption tests under Section 1202(c)(3)?

The related-person rule tests the four-year period beginning two years before issuance. The significant-redemption rule tests the two-year period beginning one year before issuance and also requires purchased-stock value exceeding 5% of all stock value at the start of that period. Both apply their respective aggregate de minimis conditions and disregarded-purchase exceptions under Reg. §1.1202-2.

What if a redemption already happened?

Reconstruct issuance and purchase dates, holder relationships, aggregate amounts and purchase-by-purchase percentages. Apply each rule independently and check the exact conditions for service termination, death, disability or mental incompetency, divorce and service-related shareholder transfers before deciding the result.

Questions About Your Specific Situation?

For a specific buyback, assemble issuance dates, seller relationships, prior purchases, and supporting valuations. Those facts determine which shareholders and issuances need analysis.

If you'd like to discuss your QSBS situation or need help planning around a company redemption, book a free introductory call. We can discuss the proposed transaction and the records needed for a review.

Related Posts

• Qualified Small Business Stock (QSBS): What Founders, Investors, and Employees Need to Know — The comprehensive guide to QSBS basics, including the new OBBBA updates.
• The 100% QSBS Exclusion Is Now Permanent—Here's Why It Matters — Understanding the enhanced exclusion and how it changes your exit planning.
• Can You Exercise a Stock Option With a Nonrecourse Note and Start Your QSBS Holding Period? — How exercise mechanics start the §1202 clock.
• Section 83(b) Elections: What Startup Founders and Employees Need to Know — The interplay between 83(b) elections and QSBS qualification.
• C-Corp vs. S-Corp vs. LLC: Which Structure Is Best for Your Washington Startup? — Why entity choice matters for QSBS eligibility and tax optimization.

This post is for educational purposes only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a qualified attorney about your specific situation.